Short answer: A facelift treats tissue descent; laser resurfacing may address selected surface changes, and fat grafting may restore volume. PRP and nanofat have less certain clinical benefits and should not be presented as proven ways to speed facelift healing or guarantee regeneration. Each addition needs its own indication, risk discussion and recovery plan. PRP evidence review; nanofat review.
Current practice: Dr. Walter Zamarian Jr. does not offer laser resurfacing. The treatments discussed below are not a package offered by the clinic; his surgical evaluation can address facelift and facial fat grafting when indicated.
Medical review: Dr. Walter Zamarian Jr. – plastic surgeon in Londrina, Brazil, CRM-PR 17.388, RQE 15.688, full member of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery (SBCP) and member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). Last reviewed on May 22, 2026.
Dr. Zamarian has performed more than 8,000 surgeries over two decades — today, by deliberate choice, more than 90% of his surgeries are deep plane facelifts with fat grafting — 3 per week (~150 per year) — with a focused practice in Deep Plane facelift, neck lift, facial fat grafting and advanced facial rejuvenation planning.
A facelift can reposition deeper facial structures, improve jowls and redefine the jawline, but it does not address every skin or volume concern. Laser resurfacing, facial fat grafting, PRP and nanofat have different purposes and different levels of supporting evidence. They should not be offered as interchangeable ways to improve the surgical result.
The important point is hierarchy. The Deep Plane facelift remains the structural procedure; complementary treatments are not a shortcut, not a substitute for surgery and not a guarantee of “skin regeneration.” They are tools that should be selected after examination of skin thickness, sun damage, pigmentation risk, volume loss, healing profile and expectations.
What each adjunctive treatment is meant to do
Laser resurfacing
Laser resurfacing may improve selected fine lines, sun damage, uneven pigmentation and texture. CO2 and erbium are types of ablative laser, which remove the outer skin layer and heat underlying tissue. These treatments do not correct the same tissue descent as a facelift. Mayo Clinic explains laser indications and limitations.
Laser timing matters. In some patients it can be performed conservatively during the same operative plan; in others it is safer to stage it weeks or months later, especially when deeper resurfacing is needed or when pigmentation risk is higher.
PRP
PRP, or platelet-rich plasma, is prepared from the patient’s blood. Evidence for facial rejuvenation remains limited and heterogeneous. A 2021 systematic appraisal excluded studies of wound healing, so it cannot establish faster healing after facelift surgery. A biological rationale is not proof of a clinical benefit.
Facial fat grafting
Facial fat grafting is used when aging includes volume loss in areas such as the temples, cheeks, tear trough region or jawline transition. It can complement a facelift because lifting and volume restoration solve different parts of facial aging. Fat graft survival varies, swelling is expected and small irregularities or asymmetries are possible, so the indication must be precise.
Nanofat
Nanofat is processed fat discussed mainly for skin-quality goals rather than structural volume replacement. A 2025 systematic review and expert consensus found that most applications lacked robust clinical evidence. It should not be marketed as a validated stem-cell treatment or a predictable way to restore skin. The ASPS/ASAPS statement also distinguishes fat grafting from a proven stem-cell therapy.
How these treatments fit with a Deep Plane facelift
A Regenerative Deep Plane facelift approach starts with structural correction: the aim is to reposition deeper mobile tissues, improve the midface and jawline, and assess the neck as part of the same anatomical region. Adjuncts are then considered only if they solve a specific remaining layer of the problem.
For example, a patient with jowling and neck laxity may need a facelift and neck lift more than any skin treatment. A patient with strong sun damage may benefit from staged laser resurfacing. A patient with a hollow cheek or temple may need fat grafting. A patient with thin or crepey lower eyelid skin may need a careful plan that also considers blepharoplasty, resurfacing or fat grafting depending on the anatomy.
When treatment may be staged instead of combined
Treatments may be staged when skin circulation, resurfacing depth, pigmentation risk, swelling or recovery demands make a combined procedure unsuitable. The decision should explain why each treatment is being proposed and whether its expected benefit justifies another procedure. PRP should not be repeated routinely on the assumption that it improves healing.
Combining procedures is not a badge of sophistication. The better question is whether each element improves the plan without adding unnecessary risk, downtime or cost.
Risks and limitations
Every facelift involves surgical risk. Important risks include bleeding or hematoma, infection, anesthesia complications, delayed wound healing, skin suffering, numbness, prolonged swelling, visible scarring, hairline changes, facial nerve weakness, asymmetry and the possibility that revision surgery may be needed. These issues should be discussed directly during consultation and consent.
Adjunctive treatments add their own risks. Laser resurfacing can cause persistent redness, pigment changes, infection, acne, delayed healing or scars. PRP can cause swelling, bruising or discomfort. Fat grafting and nanofat can cause swelling and irregularities; fat grafting also carries risks of asymmetry, resorption, fat necrosis or cysts. Facial fat injection has caused arterial embolism with blindness, stroke or death in published reports. These reports establish serious possible harm, not a population complication rate. See laser safety guidance and the systematic review of fat-related arterial embolism.
Patients with active infection, uncontrolled diabetes, smoking, poor wound-healing history, unrealistic expectations or higher pigmentation risk may need a modified plan or may not be good candidates for certain adjuncts. Sudden vision changes, weakness, speech difficulty or confusion require local emergency care without waiting for a clinic message. See the NHS stroke warning signs.
Recovery when treatments are combined
Recovery depends on the procedures actually performed. PRP may cause bruising or swelling; fat grafting and nanofat may add swelling, especially around the cheeks or eyelids. Laser resurfacing may add redness, peeling, crusting and sun-protection requirements. Its recovery depends on the device, depth and treated area, so an adjunct should not be assumed to add negligible downtime.
Most facelift patients need a structured recovery plan with rest, incision care, activity restriction and close follow-up. When resurfacing is included, skin care instructions and sun protection become even more important.
Frequently asked questions
Are laser, PRP and nanofat always worth adding to a facelift?
No. Each proposed addition needs a specific goal and a realistic discussion of evidence, risks, recovery and cost. The clinical benefits of PRP and nanofat are less established; neither belongs automatically in a facelift package.
Can laser resurfacing be done at the same time as a facelift?
Laser resurfacing can sometimes be performed with a facelift, but timing depends on skin undermining, laser depth, skin type, pigmentation risk and healing profile. Staging the laser after surgery is often safer when a more aggressive resurfacing result is desired.
Does PRP make facelift recovery faster?
Faster facelift recovery has not been established by the PRP review cited here, which excluded wound-healing studies. PRP should not be presented as a proven way to shorten recovery or improve the final surgical result.
Is nanofat the same as stem-cell therapy?
No. Nanofat is processed autologous fat. The presence of cells does not make it a proven stem-cell therapy, and reported skin-quality benefits remain uncertain. Discuss the purpose and limitations of the exact preparation proposed.
What is the best combination for facial rejuvenation?
The best combination is the smallest plan that addresses the patient’s real anatomy: structural lifting when tissues have descended, fat grafting when volume is deficient, resurfacing when the skin surface is damaged and conservative adjuncts only when they add value.
Evidence note: The PRP review concerns facial rejuvenation and excluded wound-healing studies. The nanofat review combines literature appraisal with expert consensus. Neither establishes a benefit for every facelift patient. Fat grafting studies also vary in technique and follow-up; this systematic review describes variable retention and complications rather than a guaranteed result.
Deep Plane facelift reference prices, 8 September 2026: R$73,500 without facial fat grafting or R$85,000 with facial fat grafting, at the maximum discount for payment in full upfront. Using an illustrative exchange rate of R$5 per US$1, these are US$14,700 and US$17,000; adding facial fat grafting represents R$11,500 (US$2,300 in this example). This is not a live exchange-rate quote. Request an individual written estimate confirming what is included; the consultation, flights, accommodation and separately hired support require their own budget.
Travelling to Londrina: accommodation, transport and personal support
We can begin with an online consultation before you arrange your trip to Londrina. An in-person preoperative consultation is still required; when the first consultation was online, that preoperative visit has no additional consultation fee.
My team provides accommodation guidance in Londrina, including hotel or Airbnb options. Accommodation is booked and paid for separately. We can recommend a trusted driver and a companion or caregiver. The driver and companion/caregiver are available to hire separately, at an additional cost.
During your stay in Londrina, you have support with dressing care and frequent in-person follow-up appointments with me. After you return home, we continue online follow-up until one year after your surgery.
Before booking, confirm the accommodation location, transport to appointments and companion requirements with my team. Your length of stay and clearance to travel depend on an in-person assessment and your individual recovery.
Considering a facelift in Brazil? Discuss whether facelift or facial fat grafting is appropriate through a medical consultation with facial analysis, health review and realistic goals. Treatments outside the clinic’s current practice require evaluation by a clinician who provides them.
Schedule an online consultation or read more about the Deep Plane facelift in Brazil.




