If you have already undergone a facelift and feel that the result did not meet your expectations — or that the effects of aging have returned over the years — know that there is a solution. The secondary facelift, also called revisional facelift, is a specialized surgery that I perform to correct unsatisfactory results or those that have simply aged naturally over time.
Over more than twenty years of practice and more than eight thousand surgeries performed, I have received numerous patients seeking a review of their previous facelift. Some had been operated on by other surgeons and were not satisfied with the result. Others had results that were excellent at the time, but time took its toll after ten or fifteen years. In both cases, the secondary facelift offers a real opportunity to regain facial harmony.
What differentiates the secondary facelift from a first surgery is the complexity. Operating on a face that has already been operated on requires a deep understanding of the altered anatomy, respect for scar tissue, and a meticulous surgical strategy. It is a surgery that few surgeons feel comfortable performing, but in experienced hands, it can deliver extraordinary results — often superior to the first procedure.
When I operate on a face for the first time, I encounter the anatomy in its natural state. The tissue planes are well defined, the ligaments are intact, and the vascularization follows its original pattern. In the secondary facelift, the scenario is different: there is scar tissue, the dissection planes have been altered, and the skin may be thinner or compromised.
However, there is an advantage that few mention: the so-called "delay phenomenon." Studies published in journals such as Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery demonstrate that skin flaps in a second surgery have better vascularization than in the first. This occurs because the healing from the first procedure stimulates the formation of new blood vessels, making the tissues more resilient and with a lower risk of necrosis.
This is one of the reasons why, in my experience, the complication rates of the secondary facelift are similar to those of the primary facelift — as long as the surgery is performed with the appropriate technique and careful planning.
There are two main situations that lead a patient to seek secondary facial lifting. Each requires a different approach, and it is essential that I understand the complete history before planning the surgery.
The facial lifting, even the most well-executed, does not stop the aging process. It "delays the clock" by ten to fifteen years, but gravity, loss of bone and fat volume, and decreased collagen continue to take effect. After this period, it is natural for signs of aging to reappear: sagging in the cheeks, deepening of the nasolabial folds, bands in the neck, and loss of jawline definition.
In these cases, secondary lifting is a natural continuation of caring for appearance. The patient has already had a positive experience with the first procedure and wishes to maintain the benefits for another decade. The surgery is usually more straightforward because the deep tissues have already been adequately treated previously.
This is the most delicate situation. The patient seeks revision because the first lifting did not meet their expectations. The most common complaints include:
In all these scenarios, my approach begins with a detailed analysis of what was done previously, understanding the technique used and the anatomical limits I will encounter during the revision.
The vast majority of previous liftings I encounter in revision patients were performed with more superficial techniques: SMAS plication, SMASectomy, or even just skin liftings. In these cases, the deep plane remains virtually untouched, which gives me the opportunity to perform a truly transformative surgery.
In the deep plane lifting, dissection occurs below the SMAS, releasing the facial retention ligaments — zygomatic, masseteric, mandibular, and cervical. This release allows me to elevate the entire muscle-aponeurotic structure as a unit, in a vertical vector that reproduces the opposite direction of gravity.
The main technical challenge of secondary lifting is the presence of scar tissue in the previous dissection planes. The good news is that, in most superficial techniques, healing occurs in the subcutaneous plane — above the SMAS. When I enter the deep plane, I often find tissues that have never been manipulated.
When the previous lifting was also performed in the deep plane, dissection requires more care, but it is still possible. Scar tissue forms identifiable planes that guide the dissection. The surgeon's experience in recognizing these planes and navigating safely is what makes the difference between an excellent result and a complication.
Each revision case presents unique challenges. Some of the most common problems I correct include:
If there is one procedure I consider practically indispensable in secondary lifting, it is fat grafting. Patients seeking a revision often present significant facial volume loss — either due to natural aging or excessive fat removal in the first procedure.
Autologous fat (taken from the patient's own body) offers three fundamental benefits in revision:
I use fat in three different preparations: millifat for deep volume, microfat for intermediate folds, and nanofat (rich in stem cells) for skin regeneration. This layered approach ensures a harmonious and natural result.
In many patients who come to me dissatisfied with the previous lifting, I notice that the main problem is not residual sagging, but volume loss. The face appears skeletal, with deep shadows and angular contours that give an aged and, paradoxically, "operated" appearance.
In these cases, fat grafting plays a role as important as the lifting itself. The combination of tissue repositioning with volumization restores facial harmony in a surprising way. Many of my revision patients report that the final result is superior to what they had with the first lifting.
The neck is often the most neglected area in the first lifting. Many patients arrive with a reasonably treated face, but a neck that reveals age — with prominent platysmal bands, residual submental fat, and loss of the cervicomental angle.
In secondary lifting, I pay special attention to the neck. Through a discreet submental incision (under the chin), I access the deep structures and perform:
Cervical dissection in secondary lifting connects with facial dissection, allowing for a continuous elevation of the platysma and SMAS. The result is a defined and harmonious neck that complements facial rejuvenation.
Just like in primary lifting, I use the hemostatic net developed by Drs. André and Luiz Auersvald in all my secondary liftings. This technique consists of transfixing sutures that eliminate dead space, drastically reducing the risk of hematoma and eliminating the need for drains. The net is removed in forty-eight hours in the office, simply and painlessly.
Secondary facial lifting is rarely an isolated procedure. To achieve the best possible result, I often associate other procedures in the same surgical time:
The eyelids age independently and often need attention in revision. Excess skin on the upper eyelids and fat bags on the lower ones can be corrected simultaneously, significantly complementing facial rejuvenation.
With progressive aging, the eyebrows tend to droop, especially on the lateral portion. Brow lifting restores openness and liveliness to the gaze, perfectly harmonizing with the lifting.
Some patients take advantage of facial revision to undergo a rhinoplasty, correcting aspects of the nose that contribute to an aged appearance, such as the drooping of the nasal tip or widening of the base.
After complete healing from the lifting (about three to four weeks), I complement the result with botulinum toxin in the forehead, glabella, and crow's feet. In my clinic, we have a team of dermatologists who perform these refinements with precision.
Men who have already had lifting also seek revision. The male secondary lifting requires special attention to preserving natural masculine features, such as the position of sideburns and the angular contour of the jawline.
The pre-operative consultation for a revision lift is more detailed than for a primary lift. I need to understand not only your current anatomy but also your entire surgical history. Some fundamental information I seek:
I request the same exams as for the primary lift, with extra attention to cardiovascular evaluation, as many revision patients are a bit older:
Fifteen days before and fifteen days after the surgery, you should discontinue: acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin, ASA), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, high doses of vitamin E, Ginkgo biloba, high doses of omega 3, and arnica. Smoking should be stopped for the same period — nicotine compromises blood circulation and significantly increases the risk of complications, especially in a revision where the tissues already have scars.
The duration of the secondary facial lift varies between four and six hours, depending on the complexity of the case and associated procedures. It is performed under general anesthesia in a properly equipped surgical center.
Whenever possible, I use the same scars from the previous lift. This avoids new marks and allows me to excise the old scar, replacing it with a new, finer, and more delicate scar. The incisions follow the same classic path: within the hair in the temporal region, in the pre-auricular fold, around the earlobe, and continuing behind the ear.
If the patient has earlobe deformity (pixie ear), I reconstruct this area with a specific technique, releasing the earlobe from tension and restoring its natural shape.
The dissection in the secondary lift follows the principles of deep plane, but with adaptations. In cases where the first lift was superficial, I find the deep plane practically untouched and can work with the same freedom as in a primary surgery. When the first procedure involved the deep plane, I navigate through the scar tissue planes with extra care, identifying the ligaments and releasing them to allow for vertical repositioning.
After repositioning the deep tissues, I apply fat to areas that need volume: temples, cheekbones, nasolabial folds, marionette lines, and jaw contour. Nanofat is distributed superficially across the face to stimulate skin regeneration.
The most important principle of closure in the secondary lift is: all tension must be supported by the deep tissues, never by the skin. The skin is simply redraped over the new structure, without stretching. This is what ensures fine scars and a natural result, without a "pulled" appearance.
I finish with the Auersvald hemostatic mesh, which will be removed in forty-eight hours. This technique is especially valuable in revisions, as scar tissues can bleed more easily.
The recovery from the secondary lift is very similar to that of the primary lift, with some particularities:
You will remain with a compressive dressing and the hemostatic mesh. There will be swelling and some discomfort, controlled with medication. Keep your head elevated and apply cold compresses as directed. Return to the office in forty-eight hours for mesh removal.
Swelling peaks between the second and third day and begins to decrease progressively. Some patients may have bruises (purple spots) that can extend to the neck due to gravity. This is normal and resolves spontaneously in ten to fourteen days.
In some revision cases, swelling may be slightly prolonged compared to the primary lift, due to the presence of scar tissue that hinders lymphatic drainage. This is temporary and does not compromise the final result. Most of my patients are presentable for social activities in two to three weeks.
Progressive return to normal activities. Avoid intense exercise, direct sun exposure, and any trauma to the face. Sleep on your back. Most stitches are removed or absorbed in the first or second week.
The result refines over months. Between six months and a year, you will see the definitive result. And this result will last again for ten to fifteen years, restoring the confidence and harmony you sought.
It is important to be transparent about the risks. The secondary facial lift is a more complex surgery than the primary, but that does not mean it is more dangerous. With proper technique and careful planning, complication rates are comparable to those of the primary lift.
In the pre-operative consultation, I discuss each of these risks in detail, evaluating your specific case and determining together if the risk-benefit ratio is favorable.
I graduated from the State University of Londrina and had the privilege of being a student of Professor Ivo Pitanguy, the greatest name in Brazilian plastic surgery and one of the most respected in the world. With him, I learned not only surgical techniques but a philosophy of respect for the patient and an unrelenting pursuit of excellence.
Over more than twenty years of practice, I have performed over eight thousand plastic surgeries. I am a full member of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery (SBCP) and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). I regularly participate in national and international congresses, keeping myself updated with the advances in the specialty.
The secondary facial lift demands everything a surgeon can offer: deep anatomical knowledge, experience with different techniques, refined surgical judgment, and the ability to improvise when altered anatomy presents surprises during the procedure. It is not a surgery for beginners. It is the surgery that demands the most technical maturity.
I do not promise miracles. I promise honesty, refined technique, and complete dedication to your result. If during the consultation I perceive that the revision will not bring significant benefit, or that the risks outweigh the gains in your specific case, I will say this clearly. I prefer to be honest than to create unrealistic expectations.
What I can guarantee is that every secondary lift I perform receives the same level of dedication and meticulous planning that I dedicate to any surgery. For me, the revision is not a minor procedure — it is an opportunity to deliver the result you deserved from the beginning.
I recommend waiting at least twelve months after the first facelift. This period allows for the complete maturation of scars, stabilization of tissues, and total resolution of swelling. In cases of dissatisfaction with the result, this time also allows for a more accurate assessment of what really needs to be corrected.
Not necessarily. Scientific studies show that, with the proper technique, complication rates are comparable to the primary facelift. The "delay phenomenon" improves the vascularization of the flaps, and the surgeon's experience in navigating scar planes minimizes risks. The key is to choose a surgeon with specific experience in revisions.
Yes, this is one of the most common corrections in secondary facelift. The pixie ear deformity occurs when the skin is sutured under excessive tension, pulling the earlobe down. In the revision, I release the earlobe from the tension, reconstruct its insertion, and close without tension, supporting all the weight on the deep tissues. The result is a naturally appearing earlobe.
Yes, and this is quite common. Many of my revision patients were originally operated on by other surgeons. There is no ethical or technical impediment. The important thing is that you feel confident and comfortable with the chosen surgeon for the revision, and that they have proven experience in secondary facelifts.
The result lasts approximately the same period as the primary facelift: ten to fifteen years. Some factors can influence this, such as genetics, skincare, sun protection, and lifestyle habits. Patients who take good care of their skin and avoid factors that accelerate aging (such as smoking and excessive sun exposure) tend to maintain the result longer.
Yes, although it is less common. The indication depends on the quality of the tissues, the overall health of the patient, and realistic expectations. Each subsequent surgery requires more experience and planning, but it is technically feasible in many cases.
In most cases, I can remove the old scars and replace them with new, more refined scars. Since the closure in the deep plane is performed without tension on the skin, the new scars tend to be thinner and less noticeable than the previous ones. However, the quality of healing also depends on individual factors such as genetics and skin type.
In selected cases of mild aging after a well-executed primary facelift, a mini facelift may be sufficient. However, in most revision cases — especially when there is dissatisfaction with the previous result — the complete facelift with deep plane technique offers far superior and longer-lasting results.
It is not mandatory, but it is highly recommended. Facial volume loss is an important component of aging, and revision patients often present more pronounced atrophy. The fat grafting not only replenishes lost volume but also promotes skin regeneration through adipose stem cells.
The cost of a secondary facelift tends to be similar to or slightly higher than that of the primary facelift, depending on the complexity of the case and associated procedures. Each case is evaluated individually during the consultation. What I can say is that, when compared to the accumulated cost of non-surgical aesthetic treatments over the years, the investment in revision facelift proves to be extremely advantageous.
Yes, and in some cases, filler can be a good temporary option. However, it is important to understand that fillers treat volume, not sagging. If the main issue is sagging skin and descended tissues, filler will not replace surgery. During the consultation, I evaluate each case and indicate the best approach.
If you are considering a revision of your facelift, the next step is simple: schedule a consultation with me. My team is ready to assist you, answer your questions, and find the best time for your in-person evaluation.
Learn more about the first consultation, the investment, and the guidelines for pre-surgical preparation and post-operative recovery.
Plastic Surgeon in Londrina - Brazil
Rua Engenheiro Omar Rupp, 186
Londrina - Brazil
ZIP 86015-360
Brazil
Portuguese (BR) | English (US) | English (UK) | Italian | French | Spanish