Reposition
The deep plane technique mobilizes tissues in the deeper layers to address their descent. This is the structural part of the facelift.
Repositioning, restoring volume, and caring for the skin are separate choices within a single plan.
Explore my options
At a glance
It is the name I use for a planned combination of a deep plane facelift and grafting of the patient’s own fat. The deep plane facelift repositions the cheeks and the jawline; the fat restores volume in areas that have hollowed out. It is not a cultured stem cell treatment, it does not guarantee skin regeneration, and it does not stop aging.
Aging
You may notice that your jawline looks heavier and, at the same time, that some areas have become hollow. Your skin texture may have changed, too. A single word, sagging, doesn’t necessarily explain all of that.
That observation is where my planning starts. I assess position, volume, and the skin surface separately, then look at how those choices fit together. I want the result to look coherent from the front, in profile, and when you smile.
I call it regenerative when the plan combines the deep plane facelift with the patient’s own fat. The name helps describe the approach, but what matters is that you understand what each step can and cannot do.
Three aims
The deep plane technique mobilizes tissues in the deeper layers to address their descent. This is the structural part of the facelift.
When areas have hollowed out, grafting can restore volume in selected areas. Not every area needs fat.
Texture, discoloration, and fine lines need their own assessment. Whatever effects nanofat may have, they don’t replace every skin surface treatment.
One person may mainly need the first of these; another, a combination. It is my responsibility to explain the purpose of each step I propose, including the ones I decide not to do.
Planning
I ask you to describe what you notice, without worrying about technical terms. Then I examine your face and neck and look at your expressions, skin quality, and how volume is distributed. Older photos can help show what has changed, especially after weight loss.
A fold may be related to tissue descent, to volume loss, or to both. Filling it without understanding that relationship can add volume where there is already heaviness. Likewise, repositioning an area does not automatically restore everything that has been lost.
That is why the plan is built from small, connected decisions. You should know where I propose to reposition, where I propose to add, and where I prefer to leave things as they are.
Let’s sort out what comes from sagging, from volume loss, and from the skin, so we can choose only the steps that actually serve your goal.
Candidates
I consider the combination when the exam shows both at once: tissues that have descended and areas that have lost volume, such as the temples, the cheeks, or the transition below the eyes. Today, by choice, deep plane facelifts with fat grafting make up more than 90% of my practice. That reflects who comes to see me, not a rule for everyone.
In my practice, I reserve a facelift without fat grafting mainly for younger patients without volume loss.
Uncontrolled medical conditions, smoking, vaping or other sources of nicotine, and weight that is still changing are reasons to wait. In general, good facelift candidates are healthy enough to heal well and have realistic expectations. ASPS criteria.
Discoloration, texture, and fine lines have their own causes. Fat grafting does not replace skin treatments.
The term
Fat tissue contains a range of cells and biological components. That makeup has prompted research into tissue repair and skin quality. However, finding cells or seeing an effect in the lab does not prove that everyone will get a particular skin improvement after surgery.
Nor do I describe conventional fat grafting as a cultured cell treatment. They are different preparations and different procedures. Used without explaining what will actually be done, the term “stem cells” can raise expectations beyond what the studies support.
You may also see the word regenerative attached to exosomes, tiny vesicles released by cells that are currently being studied. They are not part of the plan I describe here. The FDA, the U.S. regulatory agency, states that no exosome product is approved in the country. FDA consumer alert. In Brazil, Anvisa, the national health regulatory agency, makes clear that products applied by injection or microneedling cannot be registered as cosmetics. Anvisa information (in Portuguese). If someone offers you this kind of treatment, ask what the product is and how it is registered.
When we talk about your surgery, I translate the term into concrete steps: repositioning and, if indicated, fat grafting. Any possible additional effects on the skin are presented along with their limits.
Evidence
Marten and Elyassnia describe the role of fat in restoring facial volume. That purpose should be kept separate from hypotheses about effects on the skin. 2015 publication.
The early work by Tonnard and colleagues, in 2013, described nanofat and its preliminary clinical applications. It is an important paper historically, but it does not demonstrate guaranteed rejuvenation. Original study.
A study by Akbari and colleagues, published in 2024, followed 15 patients for seven months and found improvement in measurements of fine wrinkles. The authors themselves call for larger samples and controlled studies. This result does not justify promising the same response when nanofat is combined with a facelift. Clinical study on nanofat.
For you, the takeaway is simple: I can discuss this option, but I won’t turn preliminary findings into collagen percentages or promised years of rejuvenation.
The 2019 systematic review by van Dongen and colleagues found nine studies with 301 patients, but the overall level of evidence was low and the outcome measures varied so much that a meta-analysis was not possible. Its conclusion about improved skin quality was cautious. That limitation still matters when reading smaller, more recent studies. Review on skin quality.
I am just as cautious about claims made for other add-ons. A 2021 review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) found very limited clinical evidence for facial rejuvenation and excluded wound-healing studies. So I don’t use that paper as proof that adding PRP improves healing after a facelift. Citing something that is being researched does not mean including it in your plan or offering it as a required part of surgery. Review by Xiao and colleagues.
A 2016 trial by Rigotti and colleagues in 13 facelift candidates compared fat enriched with stromal vascular fraction, expanded stem cells, and fat with PRP. Adding PRP did not improve the effect on the skin compared with the other preparations. These are laboratory preparations that are not part of conventional fat grafting. Trial on fat and PRP.
Fat preparation
Fat used for volume needs the right characteristics to take at the recipient site. Nanofat is processed differently and does not serve the same structural purpose. I explain these differences on the facial fat grafting page.
Harvesting requires a donor area and adds a step to the operation. I assess how much fat is available, any previous surgery in that area, and the care it will need afterward. I don’t consider this step automatically indicated just because you will already be under anesthesia.
Not all of the grafted fat stays. The systematic review by Gornitsky and colleagues included 43 studies and 4,577 patients with facial fat grafting and found average volume retention of 41.63%, with a mean follow-up of 13.9 months. Results vary widely between patients and techniques, and additional grafting can be discussed once things have settled. Review on facial fat grafting.
A complete proposal has to spell out both the expected benefit and the extra recovery involved, so that your decision about adding fat grafting is an informed one.
Neck and eyelids
I may combine deep neck surgery or blepharoplasty when I find changes that justify them. These procedures are not another word for regeneration, and they shouldn’t be added just to make the plan bigger.
The neck may call for evaluation of structures beneath the platysma; the eyelids may need attention to excess skin, bags, and eye closure. Each area brings its own decisions, limits, and risks.
At the consultation, I lay out the whole plan so you can see the purpose of each procedure. If a step doesn’t make sense to you, we talk through what including it or leaving it out would mean.
Surgery
I operate at Hospital do Coração Bela Suíça in Londrina, under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Before surgery, I mark your face and the fat donor area, which these days is preferably the lower abdomen or the inner thighs. In the same operation, I perform the deep plane facelift, harvest and prepare the fat, and place it in the planned areas. In my hands, a facelift takes about three hours; fat grafting makes the operation longer, and I give you the time estimate for your plan at the consultation.
After about two hours in the recovery room, you go back to your room, and you are usually discharged the next morning after I examine you. The hemostatic net is removed at my office 48 hours after surgery, and the stitches at 7, 10, and 14 days. I clear light exercise at one month and any physical activity, including contact sports, at two months. I advise you not to drive for ten days. You can usually return to social activities at around two weeks, though some swelling may remain.
Because fat grafting adds time and a donor area, my quote distinguishes a facelift with and without fat grafting. The fee is set after the evaluation, based on the areas treated and any combined procedures. I explain how this works on the pricing page.
Recovery
Early on, swelling and bruising can make the result hard to read. The fat goes through integration and partial reabsorption while the repositioned tissues settle. I don’t judge the success of the whole surgery by the first photo taken after the dressings come off.
Follow-up visits let me check symmetry, healing, contour, and comfort. Any adjustments are discussed only when your recovery has reached the right point. The patient journey page shows how I organize this follow-up over the course of a year.
If you are traveling from out of town, planning your trips and follow-up visits is part of the initial decision. An online consultation can start the conversation, but the plan has to be confirmed in person.
Risks
The combination carries the risks of both the facelift and fat grafting: hematoma, infection, changes in sensation or movement, poor scarring, asymmetry, irregularities, and variable reabsorption. Fat can cause lumps and, in severe vascular complications, visual or neurological impairment. Review of fat grafting complications.
Numbers help put the risks in perspective, but they don’t predict your outcome. The 2026 meta-analysis by Koroma and colleagues pooled 45 studies and 10,784 patients who had a deep plane facelift: complications in 6.6%, temporary facial nerve weakness in 1.2%, and hematoma in 1.8%. Deep plane meta-analysis. In Gornitsky’s review of facial fat grafting, reported complications totaled 2.27%, mainly asymmetry and irregularities.
The result is not permanent in the sense of stopping time: aging continues after surgery, and the grafted fat that survives changes along with your body, including when your weight changes.
I don’t set out to erase every wrinkle, stop aging, or replace skin care. Nor does adding more procedures guarantee any extra benefit.
I want you to see the reasoning behind the plan and have room to decide. Care starts with that clarity and continues through surgery and your follow-up visits.
Questions
Here, the term describes a deep plane facelift combined with fat grafting. Deep plane is the repositioning approach; regenerative refers to the combination I plan, with no promise of a uniform biological effect.
No. Volume loss and the goals of treatment guide the decision. Some areas should be left as they are, without grafting.
Not automatically. Discoloration, surface wrinkles, and texture have different causes. The evidence for nanofat is still limited, and it doesn’t replace every skin treatment. I don’t perform laser resurfacing in my current practice; the comparison clarifies different goals and is not an offer of that service.
No. Mechanically processing fat is not the same as isolating and culturing cells. I explain the preparation I propose so that techniques and expectations don’t get mixed up.
Additional grafting or a revision may be needed, but it isn’t decided in advance for everyone. How your tissues respond and how much fat is retained have to be followed over time.
No. A natural look depends on planning, surgical execution, anatomy, and recovery. The name of a combination doesn’t replace any of those factors.
It varies from person to person and from area to area. In a review of 43 studies on facial fat grafting, average retention was about 42% of the volume, with a mean follow-up of just over a year. That is why I don’t promise full retention, and I follow your progress before discussing additional grafting.
We can assess together whether repositioning and restoring volume fit your priorities, separating what is realistically possible from promises about regeneration.
References
The sources below support the general information on this page. When I describe how I care for patients, I am describing my team’s routine; the guidance for your surgery will be individual.
This page in other languages: Português (BR) | Español | Français | Italiano